Discover
We look at a sample of real documents and the system they go into, noting the formats, fields, and common problems.
EXAMPLE PROJECT
Retyping invoices, receipts, or order emails is slow and error-prone. AI can read the documents and prepare the entries, with a person checking anything unclear.
01 · THE PROBLEM
Documents arrive as PDFs, scans, photos, email bodies, or spreadsheet exports. Someone reads each one and types the supplier, dates, amounts, and line items into accounting or order software.
The work piles up at busy times, and a small typo can cause a real problem later. Layouts vary by sender, which is where fixed templates break.
02 · SIGNS
03 · A FIRST VERSION
An example of a focused scope. Your first version, price, and timing are agreed in writing for your project.
04 · HOW WE’D DO IT
The same four steps as our approach, applied to this kind of project.
We look at a sample of real documents and the system they go into, noting the formats, fields, and common problems.
We agree on the fields, the checks, what counts as an exception, the AI provider, and data handling. We also check whether plain rules would do without AI.
We build and test against the agreed sample, including the messy documents, and compare results with the manual process before launch.
We confirm the agreed criteria and review the exceptions together. More document types are scoped separately.
05 · QUESTIONS
Related: Workflow automation · AI integration
It can. Fields are checked against your rules, and anything that fails or looks uncertain goes to the review screen instead of your system. Testing on real documents before launch shows where it struggles.
No. The goal is to prepare the routine ones and make the unusual ones easy to spot and fix by hand.
It depends on whether the software offers a supported import or connection. We check this during discovery.
To the AI provider agreed in design, ideally under your business’s own account. What is sent and how long it is kept are agreed first.
LET’S BUILD SOMETHING USEFUL
Tell us how the work happens today and what a useful first version would change. A plain-language description is enough to start.